About Zack

About Zack
I am a freelance writer and researcher from the Pittsburgh area. My writings have been published in
The Washington Examiner, The American Conservative, The Mises Wire, The Daily Caller, and The Federalist among other places.

In the past, I have worked on regular executive level briefings, documentary research and fact-checking, research prep for a Soho Forum, and various other miscellaneous research tasks ranging from going through newspaper archives to compiling academic profiles.

Feel free to email me to discuss your research needs and how I can help you lighten your workload and ensure your projects stay on schedule.

Email me at Zyost81@gmail.com

Sunday, June 26, 2016

The Hobbit Audio Book Chapter 1: An Unexpected Party



For a long time, I have thought it would be cool to be a voice actor. That career path doesn't seem very likely, but I figured why not read an audio book? I love The Hobbit and I thought it would be fun to read it and see what people think.

I will try to do a chapter every week, although that might not work out since it actually takes longer to record, edit, and upload than I thought it would. There is a link in the YouTube description to download an MP3 file if you want.

If you find that you can't wait for the next chapter, consider buying The Hobbit through my Amazon Associate link.

Let me know what you think!  











Tuesday, June 21, 2016

The Scouring of the Shire: Tolkien and Brexit



This Thursday, as many of you likely know, is the Brexit vote, when the UK will be voting on whether to remain part of the European Union. It has been a hotly contested campaign with tight polls. People around the UK and in the U.S. have been arguing about all of the pros and cons of Brexit for months, but I thought that it might be a good idea to get the perspective of a very prominent Englishman whose voice I have not heard brought up in the discussion. That person is JRR Tolkien.

Seeing how Tolkien passed away decades ago, it would be difficult to get his direct opinion on the matter. However,quite fortunately for us and all posterity, Tolkien left behind his voluminous writings from which we can glean his views. There are many places that could be drawn upon in this instance, but I think the best example would be the chapter at the end of The Return of the King called "The Scouring of the Shire."

It is unfortunate that many people are unfamiliar with this section of Lord of the Rings since it was cut from Peter Jackson's movie adaption. To quickly catch everyone up to speed, unlike in the movie, Saruman does not fall off the top of Orthanc and get impaled on a spike. Rather, while the heroes are off fighting Sauron, Saruman convinces Treebeard to let him go free through the power of his persuasion. It turns out that Saruman had been meddling in the Shire for quite some time and had assembled a gang of thugs that was oppressing and wrecking the Shire.

When Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin arrive at the border of the Shire they find that things have changed drastically since they left. Saruman and his goons have instituted numerous oppressive laws, destroyed the environment, created polluting factories, chopped down the party tree, created ugly public work projects, and thrown the Mayor of Michel Delving, and anyone else who opposes them, into the Lockholes.


To make a longer story short, the heroes simply can't let this stand and go about rousing the hobbits from their complacency, at which point Saruman and his thugs are quickly dispatched with. Order is restored and traditional institutions resume their functioning.

Now that you are up to speed, you might be asking "what does this have to do with Brexit?" This might begin to make more sense once one understands that to Tolkien, the hobbits are Englishmen. In fact, the Shire and its societal structure are entirely based on historical English institutions (as the wonderful Dr. Tom Shippey explains in this excellent lecture on the politics of Tolkien). The scouring of the Shire represents a restoration of the traditional institutions of decentralized self-governance that Tolkien viewed as immensely superior to the all-consuming bureaucratic centralizing state monoliths that have come to dominate everyone's lives in the last century or so.

Speaking of bureaucratic monoliths, once one has come to understand the above points it is quite easy to fit the EU into this scenario thanks to Tolkiens use of timeless applicability in his writings.

The EU bureaucratic elites and the false cosmopolitans of the UK have undergone what Tolkien scholar, Dr. Tom Shippey, calls "the wraithing process," in which a person is made hollow by the pursuit of  some abstraction, in this case, European centralization. Saruman is the perfect example of someone who has undergone the wraithing process. He started out with good intentions, but somewhere along the way he got lost and ends up becoming a force for evil himself. And in doing so he comes to disdain everyone he views as beneath him.

Once you have come to view yourself as being superior to everyone else, then it becomes a very short step to come to the view that you should be ruling these silly little people. Saruman demonstrates this when he says to Gandalf, "Our time is at hand: the world of Men, which we must rule. But we must have power, power to order all things as we will, for that good which only the Wise can see."

Such sentiment can be found in any central planner around the world, but is especially clear in those involved in the EU project, a project designed to, like Saruman's goons in the Shire, lay waste to any and all traditions, customs, and norms which have built and preserved societies. Looking at the power hungry EU central planners one can easily call to mind the attitude of one of Saruman's thugs when he declares that "you little folks are getting too uppish... This country wants waking up and setting to rights." He then goes on to threaten that if Lotho Sackville-Baggins (who turned traitor and was collaborating with Saruman) doesn't toe the line they will simply replace him with someone who does. (Quite an ominous implication if the EU continues to follow Tolkien's script.)

However, Tolkien had great faith in the resiliency and power of traditional institutions and this comes out in the story.  Upon his departure, Merry had been the horn of Eorl the Young, by Eowyn. Whoever blows this horn "shall set fear in the hearts of his enemies and joy in the hearts of his friends." Once Merry blows this horn the paralysis over the Shire dissipates and the hobbits rise up and defeat their oppressors with relative ease.

Tom Shippey points out, with great insight, that "if Tolkien were to choose a symbol for his story and message, it would be, I think, the horn of Eorl. He would have liked to blow it in his own country, and disperse the cloud of post-war and post-faith disillusionment, depression, acquiescence, which so strangely (and twice in his lifetime) followed on victory. And perhaps he did."

We can only hope that, come Thursday, the citizens of the UK have indeed heard Tolkien's horn of Eorl through his work and the works of  other heroes of liberty, and will vote to throw out all the EU wraiths and all the Lotho-like traitors who believe they know what's best for everyone else. There would still be a long way to go, but it would be the first step on the path to scouring and restoring the Shire.



P.S.
I am indebted to Dr. Tom Shippey, and in particular his excellent book J.R.R. Tolkien: Author of the Century, for coming to understand the many political themes throughout Tolkien's work. I highly recommend reading it, and, if you do decide to read it, I would be most appreciative if you considered purchasing it through the Amazon Associate link above.



Father's Day and Reflections on Family

                                                        Four Generations of Yost Men.                                                                             
This past Sunday was Father's Day and, as a result, I found myself reflecting about what my dad, as well as what my family, mean to me. There can be no doubt that I have been extremely fortunate to be blessed with a wonderful family that has been so loving and supportive my entire life, but I doubt that I reflect on this enough.

My dad has always been there for me. We are definitely very different people with very different interests, hobbies, and skills, but he has always demonstrated a deep and caring love for me. My parents scrimped and saved so I would be able to get a better education than what the lousy public school in our district would have provided, and this continued as I went to college and eventually moved to the D.C. area where I am now. Without a doubt, I would not be where I am today without all the support my family, and especially my dad, has provided. Moving several hundred miles from home to one of the most expensive zip codes in the country requires significant capital that I would never have been able to furnish on my own, being a broke college graduate and all. I was fortunate to have a job opportunity right after college, but, without my dad, I wouldn't have been able to take advantage of it.

                                My dad's truck loaded with most of my worldly possessions.

Speaking of work, if there is one thing that stands out about my dad (and my grandfather too, who is practically a second dad), it is his work ethic. He is constantly working hard. But, all this hard work is not for its own sake, as is the case for the unfortunate people who live to work rather than the other way around. His hard work has always been to improve his life and the life of his family. Compared to my dad, I am simply a lazy bum. He has provided a clear model of someone who desires to improve his lot in life, and rather than waiting around for something to change, he goes and pursues that change to make it a reality. Looking around at the world today, it is clear that we need more people like my dad who are willing to put in the hard work to bring about change in their lives.

The world is a rough place to be on your own. The institution of family can make things a lot easier. If one looks at family economically, it is a way to drastically reduce transaction costs and pool capital and resources, not to mention fulfilling important social needs. There is a lot of trash talking about millennials living with their parents, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing if the family is still working as a unit and the millennial is working towards being a net contributor to said unit. Parents invest lots of startup capital into their children to get them off the ground. In a lot of cases the return on investment is largely psychological, but if a family is close-knit it can serve as an important institution that profits everyone who is a member.

It seems to me that people who suffer from the breakdown of the family are, in the end, suffering from a foundational problem. A successful family serves as a solid foundation upon which one can build one's life, and eventually even contribute to strengthening the foundation as well. On the other hand, people trying to start out life without a family that has their back need to establish their own solid foundation or they will be building their life on sand. It is harder to begin with and is prone to more serious accidents as the construction project commences. In my view, the breakdown of the family is fundamentally a problem that affects well-being. Those of us who profess to care about the promotion of well-being for ourselves and others should prioritize encouraging the strengthing of familial ties and strive to set a good example with our own families.

I am fortunate to have been born with a dad and a whole family that has provided a solid foundation on which to start my life, and, for that, I am very grateful.